DISCLAIMER: The opinions and information contained in discussion documents are not necessary the opinions of the proprietor/organizer of this forum. The proprietor reserves the right to edit comments  to remove any material that is or could be defamatory and/or racist or hurtful to any individual person or any particular group of people. All opinion and information contained in this internet domain and on our CD or obtained via e-mail from experts@labourlaw.co.za are provided without prejudice. Neither are the  compilers/authors responsible for any failure to gain from or for loss suffered as a result of the application of any information so obtained nor does the CD library and its contents constitute legal advice. It does not replace attorneys or substitute the benefit to be gained from personal consultation with such legal advisors.

 
 
   
 

Minimum wages for Domestic workers - 2010

All Domestic workers must be granted a wage increase wage increase just above 7 percent form 1st December 2009.

Virgil Seafield, executive manager for employment standards, said the hike would apply in both area A (cities) and B (rural and small towns). 

Minimum wages of domestic workers employed for more than 27 hours a week in area A will rise from R6.88 per hour to R7.40 in other words their wages will go up from R1 340.95 to R1 442.86 per month.

The increase is based on the consumer price index (CPI) of 6.6 percent, plus 1 percent for area A . 

Minimum wages for area B  rise from R5.63 per hour to R6.11 or from R1 097.40 to R1 191.78 per month. The latter was based on the CPI plus 2 percent.

The minimum wages of workers employed under 27 hours in a week stood to benefit from the increase, with their minimum wages being raised from R8.12 to R8.74 per hour for area A, and from R6.65 to R7.22 for area B.

 

Section 197 of the LRA applies to second generation outsourcing

 

The Labour Appeal Court has ruled that section 197 of the LRA – the section governing transfers of businesses and services as a going concern – does apply when an outsourcer terminates its outsourcing agreement with a service provider – and takes back the service previously outsourced or awards the contract to another service provider. The Gauteng Law Council NewsFlash quotes Legalbrief Today which says this means that any entity contemplating the outsourcing of a service must ensure not only that its new service provider is able to take over the employment contracts with employees associated with the service but also that – when that contract ends – it is ready to receive its erstwhile employees back into its employment.

It appears that the Court is mostly concerned with employees losing long term service benefits.

Aviation Union of South Africa obo Barnes and Others v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd and Others (JA 51/07) [2009] ZALAC 12 (9 October 2009) at [65]1 citing with approval Cosawu v Zikhethele Trade (Pty) Ltd and another (2005) 26 ILJ 1056 LC at 1066 para 29  at [57]2

 

 "... sec 197 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (Act 66 of 1995) is capable of application when, at the end of the contract between SAA and LGM SA, the services that were provided by LGM SA to SAA are transferred to SAA or are contracted out by SAA to another party."1

 

I am persuaded that a less literal and more purposive approach is justified in the context of s 197. As stated earlier, the section is intended to protect the employees whose security of employment and rights are in jeopardy as result of business transfers. A mechanical application of the literal meaning of the word ‘by’ in s197 (1)(b) would lead to the anomaly that workers transferred as part of first generation contracting-out who is protected whereas those of the second generation scheme would not be, when both are equally needful and deserving of the protection. The possibility of abuse and circumvention of the statutory protections by unscrupulous employees is easy to imagine. As in this case, the danger exists that the employees may not only lose their continuity of their employment but also their severance benefits, for the reason that the old employer having lost its business to the new employer lacks the means to pay its debts.2

_______________________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________

Travel (car) allowances: Repeal of the kilometre method

 The kilometre method for deducting travel expenses will be repealed with effect from 1 March 2010. The repeal of this method will eliminate an unintended subsidy for commuting by car (a personal expense). Individuals who use their private vehicles for businesses purposes and who receive a travel (car) allowance will still be able to claim such expense by maintaining a logbook of business kilometres travelled. The PAYE system for travel (car) allowances will be adjusted so that 80 per cent of this allowance will be subject to PAYE. The 80 per cent rule will prevent under-withholding from taxpayers once the deemed kilometre method is repealed.

SARS Notice

______________________________________________________________________

Smoking at the workplace: the Tobacco Products Control Act
 

Employers and employees must take note of the amendments to the Tobacco Products Control Act, 83 of 1993  which became effective on 21st August 2009.

bulletNo person may smoke in a "public place", which is defined to include a "workplace". A "workplace" includes "any indoor, enclosed or partially enclosed area in which employees perform the duties of their employment" and further includes "any corridor, lobby, stairwell, elevator, cafeteria, washroom or other common area frequented by such employees during the course and scope of their employment."
bullet The definition still excludes any area specifically designated by the employer as a smoking area. Such an area may not exceed 25 percent of the total floor area of the public place and must be separated from the rest of the public place by a solid partition and an entrance door on which the sign "SMOKING AREA" is displayed, written in black letters (at least 2cm high and 1.5cm in breadth) on a white background. The ventilation of such area must be directly exhausted to the outside.
bulletAn employer has an obligation to ensure that:

- employees may object to smoking in the workplace in contravention of the Act without retaliation of any kind;

- employees who do not want to be exposed to tobacco smoke in the workplace are not so exposed;

-  it is not a condition of employment, expressly or implied, that any employee is required to work in any portion of the workplace where smoking is permitted;

-  employees are not required to sign any indemnity for working in any portion of the workplace where smoking is permitted;

- no person under the age of 18 years is present in any portion of the workplace where smoking is permitted;

- prescribed signs are displayed and shall make the prescribed public announcements in order to inform any person who enters or is in such place or area of any prohibition on smoking. The prescribed messages designating the smoking and non-smoking areas must include the message,

SMOKING OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS IS HARMFUL TO YOUR HEALTH AND TO THE HEALTH OF CHILDREN, PREGNANT OR BREASTFEEDING WOMEN AND NON-SMOKERS. FOR HELP TO QUIT PHONE (011) 720 3145

and the warning,

ANY PERSON WHO FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS NOTICE SHALL BE PROSECUTED AND MAY BE LIABLE TO A FINE

- employers must have a written policy on smoking in the workplace and are also free to totally prohibit smoking in the workplace; and

- any employee convicted of failing to comply with the obligations imposed by the Act or its regulations may be liable to a fine not exceeding R50 000. Similarly, any employer so convicted is liable to a fine not exceeding R100 000.

Employers should ensure compliance with these provisions in order to avoid prosecution. Section 2(7) of the Act incorporates into Section 2 of the Act, Sections 80 to 89 of the National Health Act, 2003 ("the NHA"). These sections provide for the appointment of health officers whose duty it is to monitor and enforce compliance with the NHA and, by its incorporation, the Act.

Sections 80 - 89 of the NHA give inspectors wide-ranging powers to, inter alia, inspect premises, question any person that may have information relevant to the inspection and request documentation. They are, accordingly, entitled to request a copy of the smoking policy/ies of the employer. Any person who unlawfully prevents entry into a premises, obstructs or hinders a health officer, refuses to provide a health officer with information, knowingly gives false or misleading information to the health officer or fails to comply with a compliance notice issued to him or her commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine and/or to imprisonment not exceeding 5 years.

______________________________________________________________________
 
 

 

 

Last Modified: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:10:00 SAST

experts@labourlaw.co.za

Mauritz  Moolman                                                         

Cellphone:  +27 11 082 5369666               

Landline:  +27 011 792 8824                     

Fax: 0866032274